Photo of David R. Roth

Dave is a Partner in the firm’s Litigation Department, where he focuses on appellate and complex civil litigation. As a member of the firm’s Appellate Group, Dave has successfully represented clients in the U.S. Supreme Court, the federal courts of appeal, and various state supreme and intermediate appellate courts.

In Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger (No. 23-677), the Supreme Court resolved a jurisdictional dog fight over dog food. If a plaintiff files a complaint containing state- and federal-law claims, the complaint can ordinarily be removed to federal court, and that court will have jurisdiction to resolve all the claims. But what happens if, after removal, the plaintiff eliminates the federal causes of

Read More Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger (No. 23-677)

A few months ago, securities litigators viewed OT24 with excitement: The Court had granted cert in not one, but two cases addressing when a complaint adequately alleged securities fraud under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. No more: A few weeks ago, the Court took back the first of those grants, dismissing Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank as improvidently granted. Then last week, to the

Read More NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:Or Fonder AB (No. 23-970)

This week saw the first “real” decision of the term (that is, an opinion in an argued case), a unanimous affirmance in Bouarfa v. Mayorkas (No. 23-583), holding that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary decision of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to revoke an approved visa petition based on a so-called “sham-marriage determination.”  

Petitioner Amina Bouarfa is a U.S. citizen

Read More Bouarfa v. Mayorkas (No. 23-584)

Before the Thanksgiving holiday, the Court issued its first “decision” in one of the 46 cases (so far) that make up its OT24 term. But just like last year, this year’s first decision was more of a decision not to decide: In Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank (No. 23-980), the Court dismissed the case as improvidently granted in a one-sentence order with no

Read More Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank (No. 23-980)

Wiggin and Dana’s Appellate Practice Group is excited to announce the transition of the Supreme Court Update to a new blog platform. The blog combines over 20 years of Supreme Court cases and decisions into one dynamic resource, delivering the latest Supreme Court news and appellate law insights.

Jonathan Freiman, Chair of Wiggin and Dana’s Appellate Practice Group, commented, “We’re excited to launch The

Read More Introducing Wiggin’s Supreme Court Update Blog: Combining Over 20 Years of Supreme Court Updates into One Dynamic Resource

Greetings, Court Fans!

It’s the First Monday in October, the traditional start of a new Supreme Court term. Coinciding with the start of OT24, we’re heralding a new way of delivering our summaries of the Court’s decisions: Welcome to the Supreme Court Update blog, which will combine our usual decision summaries with other news and insights from Wiggin and Dana’s Appellate Practice Group.

We’re

Read More First Monday OT24