Photo of Wiggin and Dana

Greetings, Court Fans!

Yesterday was a big day at the Court, so we’ll get right to it. In Roper v. Simmons (03-633), the Court held that the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments forbids the imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were under 18 at the time of their crimes. By way of background, in 1988 a plurality of the

Read More Roper v. Simmons (03-633) and Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Leavitt (02-1472)

Greetings, Court fans, and welcome to another season of Supreme Court Updates!
The Court is back from summer recess and is already getting down to business. For criminal lawyers, the Court’s first argument session next Monday probably couldn’t come fast enough –hopefully the Court will provide some answers to the post-Blakely disarray.
With the Court’s term underway, the Wiggin and Dana Appellate Practice Group


Read More Orders


Greetings, Court fans!
Much to our surprise, the Court issued only one opinion today, in Whitfield v. United States, No. 03-1293. Justice O’Connor, writing for a unanimous Court, found that conviction for conspiracy to commit money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) does not require proof of an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. Before Congress enacted § 1956(h), money laundering conspiracies


Read More Whitfield v. United States (03-1293)

Greetings, Court Fans!
There were no arguments at the Court this week, but we’ve got a hodgepodge of news for you. First up, the Court issued an order list Monday in which it granted cert in one new case, Flores-Figueroa v. United States (07-108). The Court will consider the intent requirement for aggravated identity theft under federal law, specifically “[w]hether . . . the


Read More Order List


Greetings, Court Fans!

The Court issued three opinions today, none bigger (in significance or page length) than its long-awaited decision on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Booker, No. 04-104, and United States v. Fanfan, No. 04-105. Booker/Fanfan generated two separate 5-4 opinions and numerous dissents, which we can only briefly summarize here. Here’s the extremely short version: The

Read More United States v. Booker (04-104), United States v. Fanfan (04-105), Jama v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (03-674), Clark v. Martinez (03-878), and Benitez v. Rozos (03-7434)

Greetings, Court Fans!

As promised, here is the summary of the new cases from yesterday’s order list. They range from several interesting election-law cases to a, well, quirky case on the probate exception to federal jurisdiction. The list is lengthy (eleven cases, some consolidated), so we’ll dispense with the commentary and get right to the questions presented.

In Randall v. Sorrell (04-1528), Vermont Republican State
Read More Order List