Skip to content

menu

Wiggin and Dana LLP logo
SubscribeTopics HomeAboutOur TeamContact
Search
Close
Supreme Court UpdatesSub-MenuOT25OT24OT23Current Page:View More Appellate InsightsEventsWiggin & Dana News
Topics
Subscribe
Supreme Court Update logo

Supreme Court Updates

OT24

FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments (No. 23-1038)City and County of San Francisco v. EPA (No. 23-753)Thompson v. United States (No. 23-1095)

OT23

Trump v. United States (No. 23-939)Smith v. Arizona (No. 22-899), Erlinger v. United States (No. 23-370), Department of State v. Muñoz (No. 23-334)Moody v. NetChoice (No. 22-277), City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson (No. 23-175), Texas v. New Mexico (No. 141, Orig.)

OT22

Biden v. Nebraska (No. 22-506), Department of Education v. Brown (No. 22-535), United States v. Texas (No. 22-58)303 Creative LLC v. Elenis (No. 21-476), Groff v. DeJoy (No. 22-174)Students for Fair Admission, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (No. 20-119)

OT21

West Virginia v. EPA (No. 20-1530), Biden v. Texas (No. 21-954), Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation (No. 20-1312)Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (No. 21-429), Torres v. Texas Dep’t of Public Safety (No. 20-603), Ruan v. United States (No. 20-1410)Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (No. 21-418), Concepcion v. United States (No. 20-1650)

OT20

TransUnion v. Ramirez (No. 20-297), PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey (No. 19-1039)Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (No. 19-1257), Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (No. 19-251), Johnson v. Guzman Chavez (No. 19-987)Brnovich v. Arizona (No. 19-1257), Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (No. 19-251), Minerva Surgical v. Hologic (No. 20-440), Johnson v. Guzman Chavez (No. 19-897), PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey (No. 19-1309), Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation (No. 20-543), HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining v. Renewable Fuels Assn (No. 20-472)

OT19

McGirt v. Oklahoma (No. 18-9526), Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP (No 19-715), Trump v. Vance (No. 19-635)Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania (No. 19-431),Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru (No. 19-267)Chiafalo v. Washington (No. 19-465), Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants (No. 19-631)

OT18

Kisor v. Wilkie (No. 18-15), Food Marketing Institute v. Argus (No. 18-481), United States v. Haymond (No. 17-1762)Department of Commerce v. New York (No. 18-966), Rucho v. Cause (No. 18-422), Mitchell v. Wisconsin (No. 18-6210)Department of Commerce v. New York (No. 18-966), Rucho v. Common Cause (No. 18-422), Mitchell v. Wisconsin (No. 18-6210), Carpenter v. Murphy (No. 17-1107), Iancu v. Brunetti (No. 18-302)

OT17

Janus v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (16-1466), National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (16-1140), Ohio v. American Express Co. (16-1454)Abbot v. Perez (17-586), Currier v. Virginia (16-1348), Florida v. Georgia (142, Orig.)Trump v. Hawaii (17-965)

OT16

Ziglar v. Abassi (15-1359) and Hernandez v. Mesa (15-118)Murr v. Wisconsin (15-214), Microsoft v. Baker (15-457), Lee v. United States (16-327), and Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board (16-399)Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project (16-1436), Trump v. Hawaii (16-1540), Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm'n (16-111), Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers (16-1276), Parvan v. Smith (16-992), Hicks v. United States (16-7806), Peruta v. California (16-894), Bay Point Properties v. BP Properties (16-1077), and Mathis v. Shulkin (16-677)

OT15

Order List 7/5/16Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (15-274)McDonnell v. United States (15-474) and Voisine v. United States (14-10154

OT14

Glossip v. Gross (15-7955) and Order ListMichigan v. EPA (14-47) and Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n (13-1314)Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project (13-1371) and Johnson v. United States (13-7120)

OT13

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (13-354), Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Burwell (13-356) and Order ListNational Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning (12-1281) and Harris v. Quinn (11-581)McCullen v. Coakley (12-1168) and United States v. Clarke (13-301)

OT12

United States v. Windsor (12-307), Hollingsworth v. Perry (12-144), Sehkar v. United States (12-357), Ryan v. Schad (12-1084) and Order ListShelby County v. Holder (12-96), Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District (11-1447), and Adoptive Parents v. Baby Girl (12-399)Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (11-345), Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett (12-142), and United States v. Kebodeaux (12-418)

OT11

Knox v. Service Employees Int'l Union, Local 1000 (10-1121), FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (10-1293), and American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock (11-1179)Williams v. Illinois (10-8505) and Order ListUnited States v. Alvarez (11-210) and Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter (11-551)

OT10

Davis v. United States (09-11328), Bullcoming v. New Mexico (09-10876), CSX Transportation, Inc. v. McBride (10-235) and Order ListJ.D.B. v. North Carolina (09-11121), Tapia v. United States (10-5400), Freeman v. United States (09-10245) and Leal Garcia v. Texas (11-5001)Bond v. United States (01227), Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders (09-525), Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri (09-1476) and United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation (10-382)

OT09

Bilski v. Kappos (08-964), Doe v. Read (09-559) and Sears v. Upton (09-8854)McDonald v. City of Chicago (08-1521) and Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (08-861)Christian Legal Society v. Hastings College of The Law (08-1371), Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. (08-1191), Granite Rock Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (08-1214) and Magwood v. Patterson (09-158)

OT08

CSX Transportation, Inc. V. Hensley (08-1034), Bobby v. Bies (08-598), Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc. (08-22) and United States ex rel Eisenstein v. New York (08-660)Wyeth v. Levine (06-1249), Summers v. Earth Island Institute (07-463), Negusie v. Holder (07-499) and order listVaden v. Discover Bank (07-773), Bartlett v. Strickland (07-689), Kansas V. Colorado (105, Orig.), Vermont v. Brillon (08-88) and order list

OT07

Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (06-9130) and order listUnited States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co. (07-308), MeadWestvaco Corporation v. Illinois Department of Revenue (06-1413) and order listWashington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party (06-713), Washington v. Washington State Republican Party (06-730), Snyder v. Louisiana (06-10119) and order list

OT06

Order List 10/2/2006Order List 9/28/2006

OT05

First Monday 2005 Term

OT04

Order List 10/4/2024

OT03

United States v. Benitez (03-167) and Virginia v. Maryland (Orig. 129)United States v. Banks (02-473), Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez (02-749) and order listTorres v. Mullin (03-5781) and Concrete Works of Colorado v. City and County of Denver (02-1673)

OT02

Nike, Inc. v. Kasky (02-575), Georgia v. Ashcroft (02-182), Wiggins v. Smith (02-311) and order listLawrence v. Texas (02-102), Stogner v. California (01-1757), and United States v. American Library Assn (02-361)Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle (02-634) and American Insurance Assn v. Garamendi (02-722)

Published by
Wiggin and Dana LLP logo
RSS LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About the Firm

Wiggin and Dana is a full-service law firm of highly talented, creative and experienced lawyers dedicated to exceeding our clients’ expectations every day.

Read More...

Topics

Archives

Copyright © 2026, Wiggin and Dana LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo

In addition to cookies that are necessary for website operation, this website uses cookies and other tracking tools for various purposes, including to provide enhanced functionality and measure website performance.

AgreeDecline