Greetings Court fans!
Three grants off the order list, and unlike some of their recent grants, these cases actually look somewhat interesting:
1. Smith v. Jackson (03-1160): In this case, the Court will resolve a circuit split on whether “disparate impact” claims are cognizable under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
2. Small v. United States (03-750): Once you commit a felony (or


Read More Order List


Greetings, Court fans!

Before heading off for a month-long recess, the Court hit us with four opinions and an order list. Two of the opinions were per curiam, however, so the Update shouldn’t be too daunting.

In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Banks, 03-892, 543 U.S. __ (2005), a unanimous Court (minus the Chief, who did not participate) held that whenever a litigant’s recovery

Read More Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Banks (03-892), Illinois v. Caballes (03-923), Howell v. Mississippi (03-9560) and Bell v. Cone (04-3940

T
wo opinions so far this week, with possibly more to come tomorrow!
 
Today, the Court issued its latest ruling in an original jurisdiction case, Kansas v. Colorado, No. 105 orig., which involves a longstanding dispute between the two states over the use of the Arkansas River (AKA “the Nile of America”). Kansas won a finding that Colorado had unlawfully depleted


Read More Kansas v. Colorado, No. 105 orig, City of San Diego, Calif. v. Roe, National Cable & Telecomm. Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Services (04-277), and FCC v. Brand X Internet Services (04-281)

Greetings, Court Fans!

We’re back to finish up the Term! Because this is a lengthy Update (three opinions and nine cert grants), we should do a few things at the outset. First, we want to thank all of you for following the Court with us this Term — we very much appreciate your responses, comments, and criticisms, and we look forward to sending more Updates
Read More National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Services (04-277), Castle Rock v. Gonzalez (04-278) and Bell v. Thompson (04-514) and order lists


Greetings, Court Fans!

The Court hit us with three more opinions today, in what has been a very big week for employment lawyers. Yesterday, the Court authorized retaliation actions for Title IX whistleblowers, and today it held that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) authorizes disparate-impact claims . In Smith v. City of Jackson, Mississippi (03-1160), Smith and other senior police officers challenged

Read More Smith v. City of Jackson, Mississippi (03-1160), Rhines v. Weber (03-9046) and Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. (03-1696)

 


Greetings, Court fans!

The Court is working overtime to get those final opinions out – causing us to do the same. Here are the rest of the decisions from Monday in what was a mixed week for criminals.

In Samson v. California (04-9728), the Court ruled 6-3 that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit police from performing a suspicionless search of a parolee. Under California


Read More Part II: Samson v. California (04-9728), Davis v. Washington (05-5224), Hammon v. Indiana (05-5707) and Youngblood v. West Virginia (05-6997)