… Read More Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (No. 21-1168), Counterman v. Colorado (No. 22-138), Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski (No. 22-105)
  • In Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railroad (No. 22-1168), the Court’s three most conservative justices united with its two most liberal ones to uphold a Pennsylvania statute providing that companies that register to do business in the state thereby consent to the Pennsylvania courts exercising general personal jurisdiction
… Read More Arizona v. Navajo Nation (No. 21-1484), Yegiazaryan v. Smagin (No. 22-381), Pugin v. Garland (No. 22-23)
  • Pugin v. Garland (No. 22-23), a 6-3 decision (with Justices Jackson and Gorsuch swapping places from the most-common 6-3 line-up) holding that an offense can “relate to obstruction of
… Read More Haaland v. Brackeen (No. 21-376), United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc. (No. 21-1052), Lora v. United States (No. 21-376)

Partner Tadhg Dooley was among the Connecticut litigators quoted in a Law360 feature published on June 14, 2023, in which ‘Connecticut lawyers weigh[ed] in on distinctive elements of Nutmeg State practice that might trip up unwary out-of-state counsel, newcomers or even lifelong practitioners’.

To read the article, click here.

Read More Partner Tadhg Dooley Weighs in on Distinctive Elements of Nutmeg State Practice

About Our Supreme Court Update Blog

Summarizing Supreme Court Decisions Since OT02

Over 20 years ago, Wiggin and Dana’s Appellate practice started the Supreme Court Update as an email listserv summarizing every one of the Supreme Court’s decisions for clients and friends of the firm. Authored by various Wiggin attorneys over the years, the Supreme Court Update has long been a resource for those interested in learning about the full scope of the Court’s activities and not just the high-profile decisions covered by major media. Today, we’ve replaced our email listserv with the Supreme Court Update Blog, which is more user-friendly and makes it easier for readers to find prior Supreme Court Updates of interest. But while the format has changed, our commitment to covering the latest developments at the Court in a timely manner remains. This newer format will allow us to expand our coverage beyond the Supreme Court, writing about prominent cases and notable issues in the state supreme courts and intermediate federal appellate courts.

Blog Editors