Greetings, Court Fans!

It’s the First Monday in October, the traditional start of a new Supreme Court term. Coinciding with the start of OT24, we’re heralding a new way of delivering our summaries of the Court’s decisions: Welcome to the Supreme Court Update blog, which will combine our usual decision summaries with other news

The Nine closed out OT23 with their so-called “clean-up conference” last Tuesday, issuing multiple GVRs in cases controlled by recent opinions and granting cert in five new cases for OT24. We’ll attend to some clean-up of our own with this penultimate Update of the term, covering three decisions that were somewhat obscured amidst the end-of-term

We’re back with the nightcap of today’s doubleheader, consisting of summaries of Moody v. NetChoice (No. 22-277), an important First Amendment case that turned into an important case on facial constitutional challenges; City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson (No. 23-175), in which the Court concluded that many western cities’ “camping bans” do

Last fall, if you asked commentators what OT23 was going to be about, chances are they would have said “the administrative state.” But things took a bit of a turn when circumstances in the lower courts conspired to fill out the Court’s docket with high-profile (and practically unavoidable) cases on TrumpabortionTrump