The Nine returned to action late last week, issuing decisions in three (well, really just two) closely watched cases:
- In Lindke v. Freed (No. 22-611) and O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier (No. 22-324), a unanimous Court clarified when a public official’s blocking of a member of the public from the official’s social-media pages violates the First Amendment, holding that the state-action requirement is satisfied only if
