Photo of Kim Rinehart

Kim focuses on class action defense, professional liability matters, complex commercial disputes, appeals and health care litigation. She is passionate about learning the intricacies of her clients’ businesses, crafting novel legal arguments, and devising creative litigation strategies. Her goal: an effective and efficient approach tailored to the unique needs of each case.  

The Nine (well, eight of them, with Gorsuch still taking no part in decisions argued before his appointment) were back in action yesterday, issuing three new opinions touching on the Federal Arbitration Act (Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark (No. 16-32)), the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Midland Funding v. Johnson (No. 16-348)), and the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act (
Read More Bank of America v. City of Miami (15-111) and Venezuela v. Helmerich & Pan Int’l Drilling (15-423)

The Nine wrapped up arguments for OT16 last week, so it’s time to start playing catch-up. This Update will get us most of the way there, with summaries of: Lewis v. Clarke (No. 15-1500), a rare case from the Connecticut Supreme Court regarding whether lawsuits brought against tribal employees in their individual capacities implicate tribal sovereign immunity; Coventry Health Care v. Nevils (No. 16-149)

Read More Lewis v. Clarke (15-1500), Coventry Health Care v. Nevils (16-149), Nelson v. Colorado (15-1256), Manrique v. United States (15-7250), Dean v. United States (15-9260) and Order List

The Eight are Nine again. After over a year of operating short-handed, the Court is finally at full strength, as Justice Neil Gorsuch joined his colleagues on the bench this week to hear arguments for the first time. Meanwhile, we at the Update have felt a bit short-handed ourselves, but we’re back to bring you up to speed on a number of decisions that predate
Read More Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman (15-1391); Moore v. Texas (15-797; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger (15-1406) and McLane, Inc. v. EEOC (15-1248)

This morning, the Court issued its decision in Moore v. Texas (15-797), an important death-penalty case holding that Texas’s outdated standard for determining whether a death-row inmate is intellectually disabled violates the Eighth Amendment. We’ll provide a more in-depth summary in our next Update, but first we bring you the remaining opinions from last week, covering the educational rights of disabled children, the priority
Read More Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (15-827), Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. (15-866), Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp. (15-549) and Order List

This week, while a potential ninth justice lectured the Senate Judiciary Committee on everything from fly fishing to “mutton busting” (but not on the age-old question of whether one horse-sized duck or 100 duck-sized horses would win in a fight), The Eight churned out six opinions lecturing readers on everything from adult diapers to cheerleading uniforms (but not the age-old question of whether you can

Read More SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products (15-927), NLRB v. Southwest General (15-1251) and Manuel v. City of Joliet (14-9496)

The Court kicked off the week with a flurry of activity in criminal cases, issuing a landmark Sixth Amendment ruling, another decision closing the door on vagueness challenges to the Sentencing Guidelines, a per curiam decision on the standard for disqualification of judges in criminal trials, and several statements regarding cert denials in criminal cases.

We’ll cover all of that below, but first—for those of

Read More Gloucester County School Board v. G.G. (16-273), Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado (15-606), and Beckles v. United States (15-8544)