Photo of Tadhg Dooley

Tadhg is a Partner in the firm’s Litigation Department, where he focuses his practice on appellate and complex civil litigation. Tadhg has extensive experience handling appeals in state and federal courts throughout the country.

  • In Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railroad (No. 22-1168), the Court’s three most conservative justices united with its two most liberal ones to uphold a Pennsylvania statute providing that companies that register to do business in the state thereby consent to the Pennsylvania courts exercising general personal jurisdiction
Read More Arizona v. Navajo Nation (No. 21-1484), Yegiazaryan v. Smagin (No. 22-381), Pugin v. Garland (No. 22-23)
  • Pugin v. Garland (No. 22-23), a 6-3 decision (with Justices Jackson and Gorsuch swapping places from the most-common 6-3 line-up) holding that an offense can “relate to obstruction of
Read More Haaland v. Brackeen (No. 21-376), United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc. (No. 21-1052), Lora v. United States (No. 21-376)

Partner Tadhg Dooley was quoted in a June 7, 2023, Law360 article titled, “Checkmate In Chess Battle Could Hinge On Anti-SLAPP Laws.”

The article describes the defamation lawsuit filed by top chess player Hans Niemann against grandmaster Magnus Carlsen and others for accusing Niemann of cheating. Niemann, a Connecticut resident, filed a federal complaint in the Eastern District of Missouri, which the defendants have sought

Read More Partner Tadhg Dooley Quoted in Law360 Article on Anti-SLAPP Laws