- In Glacier Northwest v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 174 (No. 21-1449), the Court addressed when state-law tort claims can be brought in connection with a labor-union action without being preempted
Tyler v. Hennepin County (No. 22-166), Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (No. 21-454), Dupree v. Younger (No. 22-210)
- Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (No. 21-454), in which the Court (quasi-unanimously) narrowed the scope of
Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (No. 21-869), Twitter v. Taamneh (No. 21-1496), Gonzalez v. Google (No. 21-1333), Amgen v. Sanofi (No. 21-757), Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (No. 21-1454), Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service (No. 21-1599)
- In Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (No. 21-869), a 7-2 Court held, in a lengthy decision expounding on the “purpose and character” prong of the fair-use test, that the licensing of an iconic Andy Warhol portrait of Prince to a magazine was not protected by the fair-use defense
National Pork Producers Council v. Ross (No. 21-468), Percoco v. United States (No. 21-1158), Ciminelli v. United States (No. 21-1170), Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc. (No. 22-96), Santos-Zacaria v. Garland (No. 21-1436)
Wiggin and Dana’s Appellate Practice Group Presents: October Term 2022: The Home Stretch
On April 26, 2023, Wiggin and Dana’s Supreme Court Update Authors Tadhg Dooley and David Roth, and Quinnipiac University Law School Professor of Law and SCOTUS blog contributor Stephen G. Gilles looked back at the term’s cases and themes so far, and looked ahead toward the big decisions to come.
Read More Wiggin and Dana’s Appellate Practice Group Presents: October Term 2022: The Home StretchAxon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (No. 21-86), Turkiye Halk Bankasi, A.S. v. United States (No. 21-1450),MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC (No. 21-1270), New York v. New Jersey (No. 156, Orig.), Reed v. Goertz (No. 21-442)
The Court was busy this week, with four new decisions to go along with one from last Friday. No wonder it extended the temporary “administrative stay” placed on the hot-potato mifepristone appeals from Wednesday evening to midnight tonight. As of press time, the Court has not issued a decision, so we’ll keep our focus on the cases that have been decided in the last week:
Read More Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (No. 21-86), Turkiye Halk Bankasi, A.S. v. United States (No. 21-1450),MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC (No. 21-1270), New York v. New Jersey (No. 156, Orig.), Reed v. Goertz (No. 21-442)